There are few more controversial topics within the fractious global
debate on the impact of extractive industries than ‘fracking’ – or more
correctly the production of natural gas through hydraulic fracturing.
Invented in America, fracking has produced a cheap gas bonanza in the US
– and a storm of criticism from community and environmental activists.
And now companies want to exploit the rich shale beds of South Africa’s
Karoo desert – but at what price?
With fracking still to commence in the Karoo, OSISA has funded the production of a 55-minute documentary film and photo exhibition on the fierce fight around fracking in South Africa.
The project – entitled The High Cost of Cheap Gas – will lift the lid
on the planned developments in both South Africa, providing
high-quality, evidence-based material to help raise awareness and spark
debate among the public and decision-makers across the region about the
real costs of natural gas development, particularly its longer-term
impacts on the environment, water supplies, and the health and
livelihoods of marginalised people, such as the San.
In particular, the film will provide the latest scientific
information because the current debate around natural gas development in
southern Africa has not been informed by the latest science ‘leaking’
from the gas fields of America, even though the hard lessons learned in
the home of fracking must inform southern Africa’s response to this type
of international investment.
The project will link the southern African context with the American
experience to inform this critical debate and help countries in the
region to take advantage of the small window of opportunity for them to
make choices that secure the best - most healthy and wealthy future –
for their people.
The project will look at the well-trumpeted (by companies and
governments) benefits of natural gas development as well as the
potentially high costs of ‘fracking’ in the Karoo through the lens of
water rights, human rights and environmental costs, as well as more
darker, hidden costs like the impact of endocrine disruptor chemicals
and other pollutants on fertility, childhood development and the long
term health of the region.
The film will gather evidence and analysis from both sides of the
debate – from interviews with the multinational oil company, Shell, to
discussions with San groups who have lived on this land for millennia,
from talks with industry figures in America to conversations with South
African farmers about their concerns over water, from meetings with
activists behind burning barricades to visits to mining communities that
have experienced this type of development before.
The film is already in the pre-production, research and development
phase and a considerable amount has already been accomplished. The
director, Jeff Barbee – who was responsible for the award-winning OSISA and OSF-SA supported multimedia project, Creating a Climate for Change
in 2011 – has collected a series of stunning photos from the Karoo,
both on the ground and from the air and has accumulated a large and
growing file of rare material from the SKA and SALT telescopes and
interviews with local communities.
Indeed, enough material has already been collected to produce a 9
minute film that was released in February 2013 and was screened on a
special nationwide US TV broadcast by LinkTV.
But the feature-length documentary will provide a more detailed
investigation into the possible long term impacts – both the benefits in
terms of jobs and cheaper gas and the possible costs.
Long Term Effects - Southern Africa struggles today with a dirty
extraction legacy, from acid mine drainage to the loss of Karoo towns
like Prieska where blue asbestos mining has resulted in thousands of
deaths and widespread illness. This project will look at this history to
determine how well South Africa may deal with the large-scale
extraction of natural gas, and dangers like groundwater contamination
associated with all parts of the process, not only fracking. In
addition, large scale extractive industries have not necessarily turned
into the job creation, poverty elimination and development vehicles the
governments often proclaim. Meanwhile, oversight and accountability
mechanisms are being increasingly limited. South Africa’s Secrecy Bill
is a case in point. Interestingly, similar legal developments in the
United States in 2002 made access to information around the
environmental effects of fracking almost impossible and sometimes even
illegal to collate.
Water rights – The process of natural gas development requires large
amounts of water, mixed with a secret combination of chemicals, injected
into the wells. Since the proposed areas for development are
predominately deserts, there is an obvious concern about where the
billions of litres of water are supposed to come from. In addition, the
real possibility of large scale pollution of the few precious clean
water resources is a major cost of this development.
Threat to Long Term Developments based on science – Natural gas
development could threaten the operations of the planned Square
Kilometre Array – the largest radio telescope on the planet – as well as
the largest optical telescope in the southern Hemisphere.
Health – Health experts like Dr Theo Colborn study chemicals used in
and given off by natural gas production, both in the air and water,
explain very clearly the long-term effects of these chemicals and the
long-term groundwater and air pollution associated with it. Chemicals
like BPA, ethylene glycols and other endocrine disrupters cause
long-term genetic damage across generations. The associated air
pollution, called ground-level ozone, also causes severe lung problems
in children.
Lessons from abroad - The film will look at the result of the natural
gas development that has already taken place in Colorado since 1998.
Many of these same companies are applying to come to southern Africa –
and their track records are not encouraging. The film will help people
in southern Africa to learn from mistakes that people in the US made by
allowing this development to take place without proper oversight.
No comments:
Post a Comment